This tutorial illustrates the core visualization utilities available in Ax.
import numpy as np
from ax import (
Arm,
ComparisonOp,
RangeParameter,
ParameterType,
SearchSpace,
SimpleExperiment,
OutcomeConstraint,
)
from ax.metrics.l2norm import L2NormMetric
from ax.modelbridge.cross_validation import cross_validate
from ax.modelbridge.registry import Models
from ax.plot.contour import interact_contour, plot_contour
from ax.plot.diagnostic import interact_cross_validation
from ax.plot.scatter import(
interact_fitted,
plot_objective_vs_constraints,
tile_fitted,
)
from ax.plot.slice import plot_slice
from ax.utils.measurement.synthetic_functions import hartmann6
from ax.utils.notebook.plotting import render, init_notebook_plotting
init_notebook_plotting()
[INFO 04-17 18:45:36] ipy_plotting: Injecting Plotly library into cell. Do not overwrite or delete cell.
The vizualizations require an experiment object and a model fit on the evaluated data. The routine below is a copy of the Developer API tutorial, so the explanation here is omitted. Retrieving the experiment and model objects for each API paradigm is shown in the respective tutorials
noise_sd = 0.1
param_names = [f"x{i+1}" for i in range(6)] # x1, x2, ..., x6
def noisy_hartmann_evaluation_function(parameterization):
x = np.array([parameterization.get(p_name) for p_name in param_names])
noise1, noise2 = np.random.normal(0, noise_sd, 2)
return {
"hartmann6": (hartmann6(x) + noise1, noise_sd),
"l2norm": (np.sqrt((x ** 2).sum()) + noise2, noise_sd)
}
hartmann_search_space = SearchSpace(
parameters=[
RangeParameter(
name=p_name, parameter_type=ParameterType.FLOAT, lower=0.0, upper=1.0
)
for p_name in param_names
]
)
exp = SimpleExperiment(
name="test_branin",
search_space=hartmann_search_space,
evaluation_function=noisy_hartmann_evaluation_function,
objective_name="hartmann6",
minimize=True,
outcome_constraints=[
OutcomeConstraint(
metric=L2NormMetric(
name="l2norm", param_names=param_names, noise_sd=0.2
),
op=ComparisonOp.LEQ,
bound=1.25,
relative=False,
)
],
)
After doing (N_BATCHES=15
) rounds of optimization, fit final GP using all data to feed into the plots.
N_RANDOM = 5
BATCH_SIZE = 1
N_BATCHES = 15
sobol = Models.SOBOL(exp.search_space)
exp.new_batch_trial(generator_run=sobol.gen(N_RANDOM))
for i in range(N_BATCHES):
intermediate_gp = Models.GPEI(experiment=exp, data=exp.eval())
exp.new_trial(generator_run=intermediate_gp.gen(BATCH_SIZE))
model = Models.GPEI(experiment=exp, data=exp.eval())
The plot below shows the response surface for hartmann6
metric as a function of the x1
, x2
parameters.
The other parameters are fixed in the middle of their respective ranges, which in this example is 0.5 for all of them.
render(plot_contour(model=model, param_x="x1", param_y="x2", metric_name='hartmann6'))
The plot below allows toggling between different pairs of parameters to view the contours.
render(interact_contour(model=model, metric_name='hartmann6'))
This plot illustrates the tradeoffs achievable for 2 different metrics. The plot takes the x-axis metric as input (usually the objective) and allows toggling among all other metrics for the y-axis.
This is useful to get a sense of the pareto frontier (i.e. what is the best objective value achievable for different bounds on the constraint)
render(plot_objective_vs_constraints(model, 'hartmann6', rel=False))
CV plots are useful to check how well the model predictions calibrate against the actual measurements. If all points are close to the dashed line, then the model is a good predictor of the real data.
cv_results = cross_validate(model)
render(interact_cross_validation(cv_results))
Slice plots show the metric outcome as a function of one parameter while fixing the others. They serve a similar function as contour plots.
render(plot_slice(model, "x2", "hartmann6"))
Tile plots are useful for viewing the effect of each arm.
render(interact_fitted(model, rel=False))
Total runtime of script: 2 minutes, 5.86 seconds.